Communication at the Service of an Authentic Culture of Encounter
[Sunday, 1 June 2014]
Today we are living in a world which is growing ever “smaller” and
where, as a result, it would seem to be easier for all of us to be
neighbours. Developments in travel and communications technology are
bringing us closer together and making us more connected, even as
globalization makes us increasingly interdependent. Nonetheless,
divisions, which are sometimes quite deep, continue to exist within our
human family. On the global level we see a scandalous gap between the
opulence of the wealthy and the utter destitution of the poor. Often we
need only walk the streets of a city to see the contrast between people
living on the street and the brilliant lights of the store windows. We
have become so accustomed to these things that they no longer unsettle
us. Our world suffers from many forms of exclusion, marginalization and
poverty, to say nothing of conflicts born of a combination of economic,
political, ideological, and, sadly, even religious motives.
In a world like this, media can help us to feel closer to one
another, creating a sense of the unity of the human family which can in
turn inspire solidarity and serious efforts to ensure a more dignified
life for all. Good communication helps us to grow closer, to know one
another better, and ultimately, to grow in unity. The walls which divide
us can be broken down only if we are prepared to listen and learn from
one another. We need to resolve our differences through forms of
dialogue which help us grow in understanding and mutual respect. A
culture of encounter demands that we be ready not only to give, but also
to receive. Media can help us greatly in this, especially nowadays,
when the networks of human communication have made unprecedented
advances. The internet, in particular, offers immense possibilities for
encounter and solidarity. This is something truly good, a gift from God.
This is not to say that certain problems do not exist. The speed
with which information is communicated exceeds our capacity for
reflection and judgement, and this does not make for more balanced and
proper forms of self-expression. The variety of opinions being aired can
be seen as helpful, but it also enables people to barricade themselves
behind sources of information which only confirm their own wishes and
ideas, or political and economic interests. The world of communications
can help us either to expand our knowledge or to lose our bearings. The
desire for digital connectivity can have the effect of isolating us from
our neighbours, from those closest to us. We should not overlook the
fact that those who for whatever reason lack access to social media run
the risk of being left behind.
While these drawbacks are real, they do not justify rejecting social
media; rather, they remind us that communication is ultimately a human
rather than technological achievement. What is it, then, that helps us,
in the digital environment, to grow in humanity and mutual
understanding? We need, for example, to recover a certain sense of
deliberateness and calm. This calls for time and the ability to be
silent and to listen. We need also to be patient if we want to
understand those who are different from us. People only express
themselves fully when they are not merely tolerated, but know that they
are truly accepted. If we are genuinely attentive in listening to
others, we will learn to look at the world with different eyes and come
to appreciate the richness of human experience as manifested in
different cultures and traditions. We will also learn to appreciate more
fully the important values inspired by Christianity, such as the vision
of the human person, the nature of marriage and the family, the proper
distinction between the religious and political spheres, the principles
of solidarity and subsidiarity, and many others.
 |
| La parabola del Buon Samaritano Messina Chiesa della Medaglia Miracolosa Casa di Ospitalità Collereale (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
How, then, can communication be at the service of an authentic
culture of encounter? What does it mean for us, as disciples of the
Lord, to encounter others in the light of the Gospel? In spite of our
own limitations and sinfulness, how do we draw truly close to one
another? These questions are summed up in what a scribe – a communicator
– once asked
Jesus: “And who is my neighbour?” (Lk 10:29). This
question can help us to see communication in terms of “neighbourliness”.
We might paraphrase the question in this way: How can we be
“neighbourly” in our use of the communications media and in the new
environment created by digital technology? I find an answer in the
parable of the Good Samaritan, which is also a parable about
communication. Those who communicate, in effect, become neighbours. The
Good Samaritan not only draws nearer to the man he finds half dead on
the side of the road; he takes responsibility for him. Jesus shifts our
understanding: it is not just about seeing the other as someone like
myself, but of the ability to make myself like the other. Communication
is really about realizing that we are all
human beings, children of God.
I like seeing this power of communication as “neighbourliness”.
Whenever communication is primarily aimed at promoting consumption
or manipulating others, we are dealing with a form of violent aggression
like that suffered by the man in the parable, who was beaten by robbers
and left abandoned on the road. The Levite and the priest do not regard
him as a neighbour, but as a stranger to be kept at a distance. In
those days, it was rules of ritual purity which conditioned their
response. Nowadays there is a danger that certain media so condition our
responses that we fail to see our real neighbour.
It is not enough to be passersby on the digital highways, simply
“connected”; connections need to grow into true encounters. We cannot
live apart, closed in on ourselves. We need to love and to be loved. We
need tenderness. Media strategies do not ensure beauty, goodness and
truth in communication. The world of media also has to be concerned with
humanity, it too is called to show tenderness. The digital world can be
an environment rich in humanity; a network not of wires but of people.
The impartiality of media is merely an appearance; only those who go out
of themselves in their communication can become a true point of
reference for others. Personal engagement is the basis of the
trustworthiness of a communicator. Christian witness, thanks to the
internet, can thereby reach the peripheries of human existence.
As I have frequently observed, if a choice has to be made between a
bruised Church which goes out to the streets and a Church suffering from
self-absorption, I certainly prefer the first. Those “streets” are the
world where people live and where they can be reached, both effectively
and affectively. The digital highway is one of them, a street teeming
with people who are often hurting, men and women looking for salvation
or hope. By means of the internet, the Christian message can reach “to
the ends of the earth” (Acts 1:8). Keeping the doors of our churches
open also means keeping them open in the digital environment so that
people, whatever their situation in life, can enter, and so that the
Gospel can go out to reach everyone. We are called to show that the
Church is the home of all. Are we capable of communicating the image of
such a Church? Communication is a means of expressing the missionary
vocation of the entire Church; today the social networks are one way to
experience this call to discover the beauty of faith, the beauty of
encountering Christ. In the area of communications too, we need a Church
capable of bringing warmth and of stirring hearts.
Effective Christian witness is not about bombarding people with
religious messages, but about our willingness to be available to others
“by patiently and respectfully engaging their questions and their doubts
as they advance in their search for the truth and the meaning of human
existence” (BENEDICT XVI, Message for the 47th World Communications Day,
2013). We need but recall the story of the disciples on the way to
Emmaus. We have to be able to dialogue with the men and women of today,
to understand their expectations, doubts and hopes, and to bring them
the Gospel, Jesus Christ himself, God incarnate, who died and rose to
free us from sin and death. We are challenged to be people of depth,
attentive to what is happening around us and spiritually alert. To
dialogue means to believe that the “other” has something worthwhile to
say, and to entertain his or her point of view and perspective. Engaging
in dialogue does not mean renouncing our own ideas and traditions, but
the claim that they alone are valid or absolute.
May the image of the Good Samaritan who tended to the wounds of the
injured man by pouring oil and wine over them be our inspiration. Let
our communication be a balm which relieves pain and a fine wine which
gladdens hearts. May the light we bring to others not be the result of
cosmetics or special effects, but rather of our being loving and
merciful “neighbours” to those wounded and left on the side of the road.
Let us boldly become citizens of the digital world. The Church needs to
be concerned for, and present in, the world of communication, in order
to dialogue with people today and to help them encounter Christ. She
needs to be a Church at the side of others, capable of accompanying
everyone along the way. The revolution taking place in communications
media and in information technologies represents a great and thrilling
challenge; may we respond to that challenge with fresh energy and
imagination as we seek to share with others the beauty of God.
From the Vatican, 24 January 2014, the Memorial of Saint Francis de Sales.
FRANCIS
