On
WordPress appeared on a blog the question:
What’s church for, anyway?
The writer of the article had several questions on his mind about faith, the way of worshipping, commuting and meeting.
He had been following along with according to him a really interesting conversation on a
couple different blogs lately that feeds into some stuff that’s been floating around in my head lately. Namely:
- What’s church for?
- Why do people go to church?
- What role should churches and religious institutions and communities play in the world?
- Do people of faith live out their spiritual or religious
ideas/beliefs/inclinations in the world? Should they? How? Why? Why not?
One of the conversationalists when he grew older his relationship to the church waned, but for him
Jesus seemingly never did.He found his way back to his, probably original,
faith. His journey took him through twists and
turns of self discovery, listening to some telling him he should never come
out if he knew what was good for him. His faith was like shifting sand. The faith of his friend — from his point of view — has been like a rock: weathered, beautiful,
solid and still there. Today they would say of themselves that they
are both deeply faithful people.
what is important is that
faith should move mountains.
One of the debaters is a 'father' in the
Old Catholic church who saw himself suddenly confronted with the remark “And pray that they don’t become child molesters” when he had written “Please pray for our Seminarians, as they take the next step in their
preparation for the
Priesthood. Pray that the Lord will continue to send
workers for the vineyard.”
He works with youth, has small
siblings that he adores, and he loves little kids. He likes to smile and wave at
little kids on the bus, make funny faces and place peek-a-boo with
babies in strollers, coo and grin, and he feels now like he can no longer do
those things; or he has to be incredibly cautious when he do them lest he
be seen as threatening. It makes him angry. And sad.
He is angry at the people who use the abusers to blame and scapegoat
queer people. He is angry at all of the people who think that queer
people are sexual deviants, sinners, or predators. He is angry that
instead of figuring out who the actual abusers are and getting them the
help they need that the
community instead scapegoat queer people.
To me, he seems to forget that that he has to bear a social function of an example of a child of
God. In the
Catholic Church it may happen a lot that there are queer priests, who may consider it a normal thing. They even often do not understand why today they will always been seen as a double
threat, both for being a priest and also for their
queerness. It makes him
sad that he has to worry about greeting children, that he can’t be himself.
He wants to reclaim the priesthood. He wants to reclaim the image of the
Priest as the person who shows up when you are in need, who helps to
craft rituals that bring life meaning, who walks with people in their
lives and spiritual journeys. He wants "to take back the collar as a sign
of hope and blessing" he says.But is that collar really the sign of hope and blessing, and does it represent the work of the
Elohim Most High God?
He would like to reclaim the idea that priests are people who can be
trusted, but seemingly forgets what damage that
church has done in the past and how many representatives have lied so much the last few years.How can he want to earn the trust of people. He would like people to begin to
see the collar as something trustworthy again, as a symbol of something
good but forgets that several of his colleagues have damaged the church in general horribly.
In many countries the paedophile priests not only damaged the soul of their victims, they made that people got enough from church and the religious institutions.
On of the other respondents says: "When a person, organization, or government opposes the full equality
of queer people, they create a gulf between themselves and me. If
there is division when queers come out or speak up, we do not create
it; we simply bring attention to the division which is already there, a
division we did not create."
"I am no longer a member of the church I grew up in. Though the
process of separating myself from my church was painful at the time, it
was inevitable. My church had cut me out of its body long before I came
out."
Brian Gerald Murphy, an activist, author, and entrepreneur, asks his readers to leave their churches that exclude queer
people and join congregations that affirm them. He asks his readers to
cultivate a chosen family that is full of lesbian, gay, transgender, and
queer folks.
It looks also like several of those 'different feeling' people want the world to believe all this would have to be accepted as the normal standard and that we should work with them to build solidarity
movements that cut across race, class, nationality, immigration status,
physical and mental ability, and any other gulf of division which has
been created to keep them apart (according to their saying). They ask that believers would leave the places which divide and join the
places which empower.
They wonder if God is someone who wants us to ultimately take charge of our own destiny
and to make our own decisions, regardless of what those choices are? Or
does God demand self-emptying and, ultimately, to recognize that He is
Creator and we are all his creatures, not in burdensome slavery but in
joyful surrender? Was
Adam’s choice a once-and-for-all choice for mankind? Or do we each get to choose anew?
I think we all have to face a personal road where we ourselves have to make our own decisions. I am afraid, no matter how you turn it, each of us has to take on his or her responsibility in their own choices. In constantly inspecting and examining him or herself. To be courageous and
unrelenting. This may be scary stuff but it is what is demanded by the
Creator Himself. To question one’s self. One’s
foundations. The things one holds dearly.
Each person has to decide if they want to be part of the World or be part of
Jehovah God.
Each person has to make the choice what to believe and how to handle this faith. Each person is himself or herself responsible for the attitude they take.
People do like to put labels on everything and to qualify people and everything else in "boxes".
Those bloggers got *shocked* when they re-read the
gospel of Luke, and when they where to
re-remember just how RADICAL Jesus is. According to them he is constantly going against
the grain of (Roman, pharisaic) society–standing for the oppressed,
etc – and he is 'public' about it. Explicitly so. "I guess he never issued a
hard-copy, political statement, but his followers sure did: that’s how
we have the
Gospels."
Alison wrote. "So what does that mean for contemporary
followers
of Jesus? Is it enough to support only the queer people who come through
the doors of our congregations? But what about those who never find the
Porch?" She has her tears confusing her, because as far as she can tell, she is not sad about
getting older. She greet her thirties with mostly enthusiasm, knowing many
undiscovered things await her in the next decade. But as the dawn of her
life breaks to late-morning sunshine, she is left to wonder: as new
opportunities open up, which opportunities are closing to her?
Every person in the world would like to know where he or she stands in the universe. Every human being wants to be part of humanity and being appreciated and being recognised. We all want some place in the
community.
Being part of the community often brings people also to wanting to find a place in the small community of the city, town or village. Parish life becomes important and one to be part of.
When we walk around in our small world, we shall give impressions to others. No matter how, but the way we dress, the
way we look, the way we act, the way we talk, send out political messages to others. Even regardless of our intent. You may question if we can control the
way we are perceived, but we should understand and be conscious that all
of us enter into the world each day as political actors, whether we like
it or not. People will read us a certain way, even if they themselves
also have a responsibility to look past the surface. The question at
hand is: is that important to you? And if so, what are you going to do
about it?
For a person of godly faith this should be very much important. Our attitude should be an example to others and should be a proof of the
choices we have made in our life.The way we behave should show to others that we are
followers of Christ Jesus and that we do want to follow Christ and
God's commandments.
In a way we should show others that we have given ourselves in the hands of Jesus, our master teacher, and are willing not to take ourselves as the king of the universe, but to accept him as the mediator between God and us.
For religious institutions, religious houses or churches, and spiritual communities it should be alike. They should be an example to the world and let it see where they stand for, what they believe, and who they want to follow. The institution has to make it clear if it wants to gain popularity by the masses, the popular crowd of this world, or perhaps to be not in agreement with the majority of people, and not be so popular by every body, but separated a little bit by keeping to the rules dictated in very old scriptures.
Some may think we do not need to reach out our hands to help our neighbours, because we
are our neighbours, connected through a common humanity. In this kind of
construct, we don’t have the privilege to “struggle” with an “issue”, but in the community we do have to stick out our hand to others, willing to care for the other person and willing to go together on the road in which we do believe that it shall bring us to a better life.
The
ecclesia or
church, should be the meeting place where everybody is
assembling, willing to accept each other with his or her own peculiarity. It should be the place where everybody is not only willing to “walk the walk” in their personal lives, but also to bind themselves
together to create a collective power in order to combat systemic
injustice.
As the blogger Alison rightly says: "Jesus didn’t live in a vacuum: the parables he taught, the people he
embraced, and the illnesses he healed made social commentaries upon the
world around him. He upset people in power, and was killed because of
it. If we really live in the model that Jesus set, then we are also
called to fight the abuses of power in our world. But first we actually
need to name what is wrong with the way things are, and envision what a
better world might look like, especially if we expect things to change."
Many people are afraid to "name" those things or to say where they stand for or what they really believe. Lots of things in this world go wrong because people do not tell the truth or do not show their real "me", their real own personality, afraid of what other might think. Openness is some thing where we should strive for in a community where brotherly love should come in the first place.
Christians should be followers of Christ Jesus and come together to meet each other as brothers and sister, making a town of Christ or a Christadelphia.
In history sadly enough, churches have sidestepped the toughest questions:
slavery, discrimination, homophobia, poverty, political corruption, and
the failings of marriage. Today we see the price they pay for being
permitted to operate publicly and
Music&Meaning thinks it is wise to keep some psychological
distance when in church.But in church we should keep an open mind and be willing to discuss all sorts of problems with each other. Yes it may be a debating place, but such one that everything is compared with what is written in the
Bible, the
Word of God. It is that
Word of the Most High which should be our major guide.
Those gathering in a private house, a public hall or church-building, in the name of God, should try to dispose themselves of labelling people. We have to disembarrass our selves and share the best of ourselves with others, freeing ourselves of the burdens of this commercial world.
But it may not be a place where we strip all the values and ethics just to let all sorts of people feel at ease. Never may the group of people elude the teachings of Christ and circumvent the commandments of God to gain popularity. That is what happened in the past so much with many churches.
Even when being in the 21st century, we should go back to the roots of the first century, and learn from the apostles meeting. Though it may look old fashioned and not of this time to still keep up a tradition or wanting to meet like they did two millennia ago. Be sure, in the
New testament we do find the example how to make church, and that is still valid today.
Church should be the place where everybody can find comfort and come closer to God.
+
Articles spoken about in this writing:
- What’s church for, anyway?
- the greatest of these is love
- Collars and Queers
- A Glimpse Inside
- Division & Solidarity: A letter to straight allies
- What boxes are you stuck in?
- What’re some of the boxes you’ve escaped from?
++
Find also:
-
-
-
- Follower of Jesus part of a cult or a Christian
- Not bounded by labels but liberated in Christ
- Salvation, trust and action in Jesus #3 as a Christian
- Self-development, self-control, meditation, beliefs and spirituality
- Answering a fool according to his folly
- Following a Compassionate Lord
- Feeling-good, search for hapiness and the church
- Breathing to teach
- Breathing and growing with no heir
- Slave for people and God
- Worship and worshipping
- Judeo-Christian values and liberty
- Manifests for believers #1 Sex abuse setting fire to the powder
- Manifests for believers #2 Changing celibacy requirement
- Manifests for believers #3 Catholic versus Protestant
- Manifests for believers #4 Eucharist
- Manifests for believers #5 Christian Union
+++
Find also articles on:
Adultery,
Allegiance to Christ,
Answering,
Attitude,
Bible teaching,
Choice,
Conduct,
Being Christian, following Jesus Christ,
Churchplanning,
Christ's Teaching,
Community,
Ecclesia,
Faith,
Manners and Association,
Meeting,
Relationships,
Recasting the New Evangelization Framework in Light of the Poor: Early Highlights and Analysis of Evangellii Gaudium
Ignatius Press to release Pope Francis' first Apostolic Exhortation
The Joy of the Gospel!
A map and guide to the Church's pastoral mission
Pope Francis and Poverty
Pope Francis calls on Catholics to create more compassionate church
Vatican officials say Pope's document provides map for Church's future
Pope Francis calls unfettered capitalism 'tyranny' and urges rich to share wealth
Pope attacks 'tyranny' of markets in manifesto for papacy - Reuters UK
Pope attacks 'killer economy'
